![]() This approach makes social platforms not so much a public square as a school playground, where the government can act as supervisor, disciplinarian, and chief bully all at the same time. That’s because for years now, states, not social media companies, have been taking the lead on deciding who gets to speak online. The rest of the world is a different story. So when it comes to Twitter’s future in the United States, loosened content moderation and Trump’s return may be enough for the company’s American detractors to claim victory. President Donald Trump, a notoriously avid Twitter user. The list of grievances is long, but near the top of it is the ongoing ban of former U.S. political right who accuse Twitter (and other major tech firms) of silencing conservative voices by enforcing what they deem arbitrary content moderation policies-a simplistic approach that, as Anand Giridharadas argued in the New York Times, could stand to learn something from the philosopher Isaiah Berlin and the concepts of negative and positive liberty. It’s likely that Musk means this in an American context, where the battle for “free speech” has become a rallying cry for those on the U.S. Why Twitter Won’t Be Restoring ‘Free Speech’Įlon Musk, the world’s richest person, bought Twitter on Monday for $44 billion, with the stated aim of restoring “free speech” on the influential social media platform. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |